Why Bengal politics are so bloody

By Subir Bhaumik BBC News, Calcutta
Violence during three phases of recent rural elections in the Indian state of West Bengal claimed more than 30 lives.
This was despite the claim of Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharya that they would be held “in a festive mood”.
The last round of elections on Sunday was the bloodiest, with nearly 20 deaths – almost all in the border district of Murshidabad.
“This district has no industry, huge unemployment, a large smuggling mafia supported by contract killers and musclemen who are used by all political parties,” says local political analyst Dipankar Chakrabarti.
Murshidabad, like neighbouring Maldah, has a Muslim majority – and like Maldah, it is also a traditional Congress stronghold, which the state’s governing Marxists are desperate to win control of.
‘Fight for influence’
Congress parliamentarian Adhir Choudhury has run Murshidabad as his personal fiefdom for decades and Indian foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee owes his first electoral win – in Jangipur constituency in Murshidabad in the last general election – to Mr Choudhury’s organisational prowess and power.
But in recent months, the Left coalition government has cornered Adhir Choudhury, after he was implicated in several murder cases and even arrested during a parliamentary session.
Mr Choudhury maintains he is innocent.
“The Marxists are desperately trying to increase their influence in Murshidabad and the village polls were seen as a big opportunity,” says political analyst Sabyasachi Basu Roy Choudhuri.
“That’s because they have lost their influence in some of their traditional strongholds, so this is a make-up game,” says Mr Choudhuri.
“And both the Congress and the Marxists have no reservation about using hardened criminals for spreading terror in Murshidabad.”
Actually, all major political parties in West Bengal – either those of the Left coalition or those in the opposition – have freely resorted to violence since Maoist rebels, or Naxalites, began an insurgency in the early 1970s.

In 2001, Mamata Banerji’s Trinamul Congress won a parliamentary by-election at Panskura, allegedly mobilising the local criminal brigade by lavishing them with cash and favours.
A former Marxist mafia don, Mohammed Rafique, swung the polls in the Trinamul’s favour and was treated by the party leaders like a film star.
The Marxists, threatened by a possible loss of their influence in the politically-important Midnapore district, hit back with a vengeance, unleashing “red terror” in places like Kespur and Garbeta.
“The Panskura line was countered by the Kespur line, eye for eye, bullet for bullet. This was no political battle, there was no place for debates and polemics, it was a typical feudal turf war fought with unusual brutality,” says Ranabir Sammadar, director of the independent think-tank Calcutta Research Group.
‘Red terror’
The Kespur assembly seat was subsequently won by the Marxists and their candidate polled 108,000 votes out of 120,000 cast.
“That’s unbelievable,” says Mr Sammadar. “That’s red terror in action.”
The red-flag waving motorcycle brigade, openly brandishing rifles and swords, revolvers and locally-made bombs, first made its mark in Kespur and has ever since been the sword-arm of Bengal’s governing Marxists.
During the village council polls that ended Sunday, this “motorcycle brigade” arrived in Basanti, an area dominated by their alliance partner, the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP).
They allegedly attacked the house of the RSP’s minister Subhas Naskar in which his wife Gouri Naskar was killed. The Marxists blamed Gouri Naskar for storing bombs in her house and blamed her death on “one such bomb exploding”.
“This is classic political tribalism. In the three decades of Left rule, the Marxists have always tried to undermine their Left allies, by force if necessary. But rarely have they gone this far,” says Dyutish Chakrabarty, a professor of politics at North Bengal university.
Mr Chakrabarty says the Marxists have not merely tried to dominate the opposition parties but also their own alliance partners – and the methods have been the same.
“Manipulation of development funds, distribution of small favours, snuffing out dissent by ganging-up tactics and use of terror as the last resort – that’s been the Marxist style of political consolidation,” says Mr Chakrabarty, who studies political violence in the state.
To be fair, the Marxist built up a massive rural support base after they came to power in 1978, by pioneering comprehensive land reforms, by promoting local governance through the panchayats (village councils) and by spending development funds on poverty alleviation projects during the first decade of their rule.
“After that, the party expanded, became more corrupt and violent. And now it needs violence for everything it does – to win elections or acquire land for industry,” says Abhirup Sarkar, who works on the political economy of West Bengal.
“And the opposition realises it can only fight the Marxists by violence, so they also look to use similar tactics, as Panskura or Nandigram has shown,” says Mr Sarkar. (BBC News)

ISSUES FACING GORKHALAND TODAY

The movement for the Gorkhaland under the leadership of Gorkha Janmukti Morcha has been in its leap. The siliguri public meeting of 7th May 2008 could be a turning point for the movement. But still the movement has to answer many questions and issues. The major issues which I perceive are:
1. Bimal Gurung said that he will not leave an inch of Duars and Siliguri but still the final map of the Gorkhaland is not been made public.
2. What is the real outcome of the movement till date? No such report has been heard or felt. Yes the movement started with ousting of subash Ghising from the DGHC’s chair of administrator, GJMM wanted to held meeting at siliguri and bouts of dual fight between Ashok Bhattachargee and Bimal took place, now State government is willing to heald talks with the party.
3. How the issue of Duars and Siliguri will be solved? It is harder than imagination.
4. It is very visible from the news print that there is no consensus between the different political parties in the hills on the issue of Gorkhaland.
5. No political parties have come with a clear strategy on their own nor a collective strategy. The movement may suffer a limp if the situation does not change.
6. Where is the intellengentia? Earlier when 6th schedule was the hot topic we read a lot from Prof. Shanti now only one person Mr. P. Arjun can be read with his GJMM ideology. Where are the others? Are they afraid? Afraid of what? When Haren Gjhosh and party can encash the news print and propagate the anti Gorkhaland idea where is our intellengentia to promote Gorkhaland movement? Why there are no articles on the movement in the English and Bengali print?
7. When the issue of Identity is raised, then the issue of coverage too emerges. What about the people living in Sikkim,Bhagshu, Assam, Nagaland, Maharastra, Jharkhand and Bihar etc. There is a discussion going on in some of the blogs that we are Gorkhas not Nepali. Will Sikkim accept the new identity? If so what about our literature, culture? Did ever exist the so called Gorkha literature or culture?
8. Lobbying: Where is the support from the other parties at the National scenario? We need Lalu Prasad, BJP from Rajasthan, Congress from UP, Himachal Pradesh, SDF from Sikkim and regional pary support from Assam and North east. Where are they?
9. Left front in their congress decisions have clerly said that they do not support separate statehood under the criteria of ethnicity. How are we going to fight it?
There are many issues that needs to be answered till we get Gorkhaland. Bimal Gurung cannot work in isolation and simply organizing rallies and speeches do not lead us towards the goal. It is high time for him to consolidate all the parties of the hills together under the Common minimum issues. Intellectuals, chamber of commerce, lobby group, Human rights activists etc should be involved.

Darjeeling leads north districts in HS – Who’s got what?

Siliguri, May 20: Darjeeling’s performance is the best among the north Bengal districts in this year’s Higher Secondary examinations.
It is also the only district in the region where the girls have performed marginally better than the boys. In all other districts, the boys have taken the lead.
“The percentage of students who have passed in Darjeeling district is 80.57, the highest in north Bengal,” said Mukta Narginari, deputy secretary, West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education, north Bengal. “This is a remarkable increase from last year’s 74.05 per cent.”
While 80.36 per cent of boys were successful, girls have performed slightly better with 80.84 per cent passing.
The overall success rate of students in north Bengal has improved this year, Narginari said. Compared to last year’s 67.13 per cent, this time, 71.25 per cent students have cleared the Plus II exams. While 73.39 per cent of boys passed, the girls are behind with 67.93 per cent of them passing.
The pass percentage of South Dinajpur, which comes second after Darjeeling, is 72.31 per cent and the pass rate among girls is 68.04 per cent. In case of boys it is 75 per cent.
The third position went to Malda, where the pass percentage is 71.89. Among the girls 69.71 per cent have passed and of the boys 73.20 per cent.
In Jalpaiguri, 69.7 per cent of students have passed. The pass rate among girls is 67.70 per and that of the boys is 71.24 per cent.
The pass percentage in Cooch Behar is 67.26 per cent. While 62.54 per cent of girls have passed, the percentage of boys is 70.54 per cent.
In North Dinajpur, which has fared the worst, the pass percentage is 65.75 per cent. The divide in performance between the girls and boys is also the highest in this district. While 70.02 per cent boys have passed, only 58 per cent of girls have cleared the exams this year.
Most schools in Siliguri said they were happy with the results though the top scores were a little less compared to last year. “Like every year, our results have been good and our students have got some of the best marks in the district,” said Chandan Das, the headmaster of Siliguri Boys’ High School. Of the 260 students who had taken the exams from the school, 250 have passed, Das added. Saikat Guha has topped with 453.
Kalyani Chakraborty, the headmistress of Siliguri Girls’ High School said Aakhi Mukherjee has scored 427, the highest in her institution. “Of the 252 students, 246 have passed. None of the students from science and commerce streams have failed,” she added.
In Sister Margaret (Nivedita) High School, the pass percentage is 98.24 per cent. “Of the 341 candidates who took the exam, 335 have passed,” headmaster M.K. Laha said. “Souvik Debnath has scored the highest with 444 marks. We have a slightly higher number of failures this year compared to last time when only one student had failed,” he added.(The Telegraph)

Morcha to meet govt on Gorkhaland

Darjeeling, May 20: The Gorkha Janmukti Morcha today received an invitation from the Bengal government to attend a meeting in Calcutta on Thursday. Leaders of the hill party have decided to go with a one-point agenda — Gorkhaland.
However, Morcha chief Bimal Gurung will stay away from the meeting, sending a four-member delegation instead.
Binay Tamang, the media and publicity secretary of the Morcha, said: “After receiving the invitation through the district magistrate, we convened a central committee meeting in Darjeeling where it was decided that Roshan Giri (the general secretary of the party) will lead the team to Calcutta.”
“The only point of discussion will be Gorkhaland. Since this is one of the first meetings (on this issue), the party decided that it would be better if our president (Gurung) did not head the delegation,” added Tamang.
Amar Lama, Anmole Prasad and Pradeep Pradhan will be the other members of the delegation, which has been instructed by the party to speak only on Gorkhaland. Chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee is expected to attend the meeting.
Although the Morcha chief had met Bhattacharjee in Calcutta in February, the discussions had been mainly confined to the removal of GNLF chief Subash Ghisingh from the post of the caretaker administrator of the DGHC and the non-implementation of the Sixth Schedule status in the hills.
Later, the Morcha had sent another delegation headed by Giri, which met the state chief secretary Amit Kiran Deb and discussed administrative issues like regularising contractual workers of the DGHC and ordering a probe into the functioning of the hill council during Ghisingh’s tenure.
Bhattacharjee had recently claimed to be unaware of the Morcha’s demands and had asked the party to submit a memorandum specifying what it wanted. The Morcha had sent a memorandum to the state government soon after the chief minister’s comment, demanding a new state of Gorkhaland comprising the Darjeeling hills, Terai (including Siliguri) and the Dooars.
“At the meeting, we will once again submit a memorandum to the chief minister with the same demand,” said Tamang. (The Telegraph)